Is Rape Inevitable in War?

As the Nobel Women's Initiative notes, sexual violence in conflict "takes place in every region of the world ... reasons for [its] use vary from region to region and conflict to conflict." But that doesn't mean everyone's raping. In fact, a growing body of scholarly research on sexual violence in conflict suggests that it is decidedly not inevitable, making it all the more imperative to take action against it. (Incidentally, the raping of hotel staff by powerful, wealthy guests is not inevitable either.)

When Eman el-Obeidy materialized in the breakfast room of the Rixos Hotel in Tripoli, Libya, the story she told shocked the world. The 29-year-old woman, a law graduate, claimed to have been held and raped by 15 members of leader Muammar Qaddafi's forces after being stopped at a checkpoint. The bruises on her face, the blood on her thighs, and the wails issuing from her throat made it clear that something bad had happened. Any doubt that remained was dispelled by the swift, vicious reaction of the security forces in the hotel (including many who had been posing as hotel waitstaff -- no, they were not just innocently pouring coffee and busing tables for the press corps each morning), who dragged her out of the reach of the stunned journalists and shoved her in a waiting car.

While el-Obeidy's courage was exceptional, her experience may not be. In the two months since her story broke, scattered reports have emerged of rape by Qaddafi's forces in Misrata and elsewhere around the country, often recounted by medical workers. Chilling details -- reports of condoms and sexual performance enhancers found in the pockets of captured soldiers, for example -- have prompted International Criminal Court Special Prosecutor Luis-Moreno Ocampo to liken Viagra to a "machete," that low-tech weapon used to such terrible effect during the Rwandan genocide. In April, U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice told a private gathering of diplomats that the U.S. believed Qaddafi's military was handing out Viagra pills to troops "so they go out and rape," as Rice reportedly put it. Last week, Ocampo told CNN that he plans to launch an investigation into these accounts.

Is anyone surprised? Since ancient times (think of Nicholas Poussin's painting, "The Rape of the Sabine Women," which depicts the fabled 8th-century BC episode in which Rome's first generation of men abducted women from the neighboring region), men locked in combat have often viewed the other side's women as part of the spoils: war booty, so to speak. A few examples, among many: the Rape of Nanking; World War II, during which American GIs, Germans, and Russians all took their liberties; the Bangladeshi War of Independence, in which an estimated 200,000 to 400,000 women were raped in nine months; Vietnam, where South Vietnamese and Americans were widely known to rape; Peru, Guatemala and El Salvador during the 1980s; the horrifying rape camps of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the nightmarish stories and statistics from conflicts all over Africa, and even American servicewomen's reports of assaults by their male colleagues. Again, is anyone surprised? <